|Benefit-Cost Summary Statistics Per Participant|
|Taxpayers||$1,886||Benefits minus costs||$1,409|
|Participants||$0||Benefit to cost ratio||$1.29|
|Others||$5,806||Chance the program will produce|
|Indirect||($1,465)||benefits greater than the costs||62 %|
|Net program cost||($4,817)|
|Benefits minus cost||$1,409|
|Meta-Analysis of Program Effects|
|Outcomes measured||Treatment age||No. of effect sizes||Treatment N||Adjusted effect sizes(ES) and standard errors(SE) used in the benefit - cost analysis||Unadjusted effect size (random effects model)|
|First time ES is estimated||Second time ES is estimated|
Any criminal conviction according to court records, sometimes measured through charges, arrests, incarceration, or self-report.
Arrests, charges, convictions, or incarcerations for a sex offense.
|Detailed Monetary Benefit Estimates Per Participant|
|Affected outcome:||Resulting benefits:1||Benefits accrue to:|
|Crime||Criminal justice system||$1,886||$0||$5,806||$943||$8,634|
|Program cost||Adjustment for deadweight cost of program||$0||$0||$0||($2,408)||($2,408)|
|Detailed Annual Cost Estimates Per Participant|
|Annual cost||Year dollars||Summary|
|Program costs||$4,572||2016||Present value of net program costs (in 2018 dollars)||($4,817)|
|Comparison costs||$0||2016||Cost range (+ or -)||10 %|
Benefits Minus Costs
Benefits by Perspective
Taxpayer Benefits by Source of Value
|Benefits Minus Costs Over Time (Cumulative Discounted Dollars)|
|The graph above illustrates the estimated cumulative net benefits per-participant for the first fifty years beyond the initial investment in the program. We present these cash flows in discounted dollars. If the dollars are negative (bars below $0 line), the cumulative benefits do not outweigh the cost of the program up to that point in time. The program breaks even when the dollars reach $0. At this point, the total benefits to participants, taxpayers, and others, are equal to the cost of the program. If the dollars are above $0, the benefits of the program exceed the initial investment.|
Abracen, J., Looman, J., Ferguson, M., Harkins, L., & Mailloux, D. (2011). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and comparison subjects: Recent outcome data from the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario) high-intensity Sex Offender Treatment Programme. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 17(2), 142-152.
Barnoski, R. (2006). Sex offender sentencing in Washington State: Does the prison treatment program reduce recidivism? (Document No. 06-06-1205). Olympia: Washington State Institute for Public Policy.
Davidson, Paul R. (1984). Behavioral treatment for incarcerated sex offenders: post-release outcome. Paper presented at Conference at Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Duwe, G., & Goldman, R. (2009). The impact of prison-based treatment on sex offender recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 21(3), 279-307.
Grady, M.D., Edwards, D.J., & Pettus-Davis, C. (2015). A longitudinal outcome evaluation of a prison-based sex offender treatment program. Sexual Abuse: a Journal of Research and Treatment.
Hanson, R. Karl, Steffy, R. A.. and Gauthier, Rene. (1993). Long term recidivism of child molesters. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 61, 646-652.
Looman, J., Abracen, J., & Nicholaichuk, T.P. (2000). Recidivism among treated sexual offenders and matched controls: Data from the Regional Treatment Centre (Ontario). Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 15(3), 279-290.
Marques, J.K., Wiederanders, M., Day, D.M, Nelson, C., & van Ommeren, A. (2005). Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: Final results from California's Sex Offender Treatment and Evaluation Project (SOTEP). Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Resarch and Treatment, 17(1), 79-107.
Nicholaichuk, T., Gordon, A., Gu, D., & Wong, S. (2000). Outcome of an institutional sexual offender treatment program: A comparison between treated and matched untreated offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12(2), 139-153.
Rice, M.E., Quinsey, V.L., Harris, G.T. (1991). Sexual recidivism among child molesters released from a aaximum security psychiatric institution. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 381-386.
Robinson, D. (1995t). The impact of cognitive skills training on post-release recidivism among Canadian federal offenders (Research Report No. R-41). Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Correctional Service Canada, Correctional Research and Development.
Zgoba, K.M., & Levenson, J. (2008). Variations in the recidivism of treated and nontreated sexual offenders in New Jersey: An examination of three time frames. Victims & Offenders, 3(10), 10-30.